Blessed is the man that trusteth in the Lord, and whose hope the Lord is. This verse is lacking altogether in ,B,D,L,Z,, 1, Ethiopic, Armenian, several Italic, and Syrian and Coptic mss, and the writings of several early Church Fathers. And why was it changed? Each member of the task-force was arranged in six groups. But in the underlying Greek text, the numbers are significantly smaller: there are approximately 5000 changes between the Textus Receptus (the Greek text used by the KJV translators) and the modern critical texts (used as the base for modern translations). A place where magic is studied and practiced? How to match a specific column position till the end of line? If the Bible has been changed over the years, can we still trust it? This practice has been imitated in most of the English versions since then. Why do academics stay as adjuncts for years rather than move around? [108] But there are a handful of other sources that contain the Shorter Ending then add the Longer Ending after it. How can we proceed with this comparison? Unlike the Dan Browns theories the Rose Line or Sangreal, the Bible is the most powerful book in human existence and therefore, only those who are intent on diminishing its powers would ever want to change it. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Many, for example, wish to claim that inspiration did not cease with the death of the last apostle but continued on with the wording of the Greek text that Erasmus, the Roman Catholic scholar, published. However because t. [18] In modern conservative Greek editions it is also omitted from the main text of Scrivener's Greek NT according to the Textus Receptus, and the two Majority Text editions. By this distinction it reveals that a number of the Gentiles were present All this is lost in the Revised Version by failing to mention the Jews and the Gentiles. They are lacking in the "earliest and best witnesses", and several ancient Greek mss that do contain them enclose them with markings indicating doubts about their authenticity, the passage contains words or expressions that appear nowhere else in John (such as the Greek words for "at a certain season [= occasionally]" and "stirring" and "diseases"), and the mss that contain this verse differ among themselves as to the wording. Now, someone might object: But thats a printers error; that shouldnt count. There are two problems with this. And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.6 And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my help. "from evil" (KJV) versus "from the evil one" (NIV). According to Reuss, the 1849 Greek New Testament of Tischendorf was the first to remove these verses from the main text.[83]. [99] In other words, the Longer Ending was attributed, in this tenth century Armenian codex, to a "Presbyter Ariston". Kurt Aland & Barbara Aland, The Text of The New Testament (rev. To be sure, this is hardly a scientific sampling; but at the same time since the two statistical models are so widely divergent from one another, we might expect to see either pattern emerge. This averages out to one change per 8.83 words. (Proverbs 17:16) "fools" setting a "price" on "wisdom" when they have "No sense" and/or they have "No heart" for it (Multiple /layered meanings), (Proverbs 17:19 b) "raises his door" Vs "makes his door high"/"exalts his gate", Deeper Understanding of (Proverbs 29:13) for mentioning God giving light on the eyes of both the poor and the oppressor. [129], KJV: 7:53 And every man went unto his own house.8:1 Jesus went unto the Mount of Olives;2 And early in the morning he came again unto the Temple, and all the people came unto him, and he sat down, and taught them.3 And the Scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery, and when they had set her in the midst,4 They say unto him, "Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.5 Now Moses in the Law commanded us that such should be stoned, but what sayest thou? The NIV translators simply made a different call from those who translated the KJV. "[79], KJV: 9 Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils.10 And she went and told them that had been with him, as they mourned and wept.11 And they, when they had heard that he was alive, and had been seen of her, believed not.12 After that he appeared in another form unto two of them, as they walked, and went into the country.13 And they went and told it unto the residue: neither believed they them.14 Afterward he appeared unto the eleven as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart,because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen.15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.17 And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;18 They shall take up serpents;[80] and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.19 So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God.20 And they went forth, and preached every where, the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs following. But it is missing from Luke in such early manuscripts as p75 (early Third century),A,B,K,L, the Sahidic version, a Bohairic ms, and an Italic ms. On the other hand, it does appear in ,W,1, 13, and some Syriac and Bohairic mss, which indicates that its assimilation into Luke had begun at a fairly early time. In particular, spelling standardization is the largest single group of changes made between 1611 and the modern era. One group of changes that I did not count involved the older English transposition of u for v and vice versa (e.g., in 2 Sam 12:21 the 1611 KJV reads seruants vnto while the modern font has servants unto. "[65] Even the two leading editions of the so-called Majority Text (Robinson & Pierpont, and Hodges & Farstad) omit this verse (the Hodges & Farstad edition acknowledge the 'Textus Receptus' version of this verse in a footnote). The entire italicized passage appears in C(third hand), K (also with the angel "bathed in the water"), ,,, and numerous other manuscripts, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Armenian manuscripts, and several Latin Fathers, Some manuscripts S,,, and a few others contain the words enclosed by marks of doubt. Compare this to other ancient documents. Uncategorized The real question is why does the KJV have 16 extra verses! What sort of strategies would a medieval military use against a fantasy giant? The UBS gave the omission of this verse a confidence rating of B. Erasmus of Rotterdam, in working up the very first printed Greek New Testament from a multitude of manuscripts, included this note for this verse: "I did not find the words in several old manuscripts."[46]. This resulted in a proliferation of readings (at least 15 different permutations among the surviving resources). This ought to be a good test-case for whether there are 421 total changes or 100,000 changes to the KJV in its nearly 400-year history. However, its recurrence as verse 24 is not so well supported. Each group individually and collectively analysed every available manuscript (of which there are currently about 5,200 separate documents in the world) and created what is accepted as the most comprehensive Biblical document available. As it forms an independent narrative, it seems to stand best alone at the end of the Gospels with double brackets to show its inferior authority " Some English translations based on Westcott & Hort imitate this practice of appending the pericope at the end of the Gospel (e.g., The Twentieth Century New Testament), while others simply omit it altogether (e.g., Goodspeed, Ferrar Fenton, the 2013 revision of The New World Version). Thus the actual number of verses in the ESV is less than 31,103. The only exception was Augustine (A. D. 400) who included the books of the Apocrypha (those "extra" books that some Bibles include between the books of the Old and New Testaments). Burgon also found a patristic comment previously attributed to Gregory of Nyssa (of the late fourth century), but which he suspected was more likely written by Hesychius of Jerusalem (middle of the fifth century) or Severus of Antioch (middle sixth century), again answering the same sort of query, and saying, "In the more accurate copies, the Gospel according to Mark has its end at 'for they were afraid.' why does the kjv have extra verses . ), (The Good News Bible, as a footnote, gave this as: At every Passover Festival Pilate had to set free one prisoner for them. My Blog why does the kjv have extra verses. How many chapters did he put in Joel and how many in Malachi? KJV: And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Jerome was the first to describe the extra 7 Old Testament books as the "Apocrypha" (doubtful authenticity). On that same basis, for the KJV to change at all would mean that it, too, stands condemned. In Genesis 22:7 AND WOOD was changed to AND THE WOOD. This Shorter Ending appears, by itself without the Longer Ending, after verse 8, in only one manuscript, an Italic ms (Codex Bobbiensis, "k"), of the 4th or 5th century. It is accepted that the bible is the most valuable item that exists on the face of the earth. I'm aware that chapter divisions were created around 1205 by Archbishop Stephen Langton. [duplicate], from your pastor, priest, or other trustworthy counselor, We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup, Acceptable comments policy for Christianity Stack Exchange. 2 (Introduction) pages 299300. ", Mark 11:26: "But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses. (In the five words he lists, the total number of changes comes out to 214 changes.) The phrase "wrote on the ground" does not require that Jesus wrote, Several late manuscripts namely U, , 73, 331, 364, 700, 782, 1592 and some Armenian mss end this sentence "the sins of each of them." (2 Samuel 12:29) And David gathered all the people together, and went to Rabbah, and fought against it, and took it. Here are the sixteen whole verses: Matthew 17:21: "Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting." Matthew 18:11: "For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost." Matthew 23:14: "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! If a law is new but its interpretation is vague, can the courts directly ask the drafters the intent and official interpretation of their law? So for some reason, Bomberg (who funnily enough was a Christian publisher, but one interested in printing the hebrew bible, the first printed mikraot gedolot, and the first printing of all tractates of the talmud bavli. Trying to understand how to get this basic Fourier Series. These apocryphal books were positioned between the Old and New Testament (it also contained maps and geneologies). head (the weight stones)head, the weightstones:. [43], As F.H.A. I used to think that the whole God/Satan thing was dreamt up by some good story-teller that, should he have been eligible for royalties would be the richest man in existence! 5. After all, if inspiration implies preservation, and preservation implies accessibility, accessibility of meaning is just as important as accessibility of words. (2 Samuel 12:24) And David comforted Bath-sheba his wife, and went in unto her, and lay with her: and she bare a son, and he called his name Solomon: and the LORD loved him. The additional books in the Catholic Bible are found in the Old . Some of them are rather minor, some are major. Talk about what services you provide. for he would recover him of his leprosy." " She said to her mistress, "Would that my lord were with the . . Here is how Wallace et al attempt to justify their deception You see, the King James Bible you buy off the shelf today is printed in the ROMAN TYPE FACE! He has a Ph.D. from Dallas Theological Seminary, and is currently professor of New Testament Studies at his alma mater. [103] It may be significant that where the Armenian mss do reproduce the Longer Ending, some have conspicuous variants from the Greek version,[104] and a few Armenian mss put the Longer Ending elsewhere than at the end of Mark of the 220 Armenian mss studied, two put the Longer Ending at the end of the Gospel of John, and one puts it at the end of Luke, and one ms has the Longer Ending at the end of Mark and the Shorter Ending at the end of the Gospel of Luke. The absence of these words from the earliest resources, and the several variations in the resources in which they appear, made their exclusion probable but not a certainty (the UBS assigned the omission a confidence rating of only D). (It is in fact for the reason of accessibility that the Bible must be translated afresh every fifty years or so.). ); An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture by Sir Isaac Newton (published posthumously 1785); Letters to Mr. Archdeacon [George] Travis in answer to his Defence of the Three Heavenly Witnesses by Richard Porson (1790, London); A New Plea for the Authenticity of the Text of the Three Heavenly Witnesses or Porson's Letters to Travis Eclectically Examined by Rev.